File #: 2020-3489    Name:
Type: Public Hearing - Sworn Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 5/21/2020 In control: City Council - Regular Session
On agenda: 6/9/2020 Final action:
Title: Public Hearing: Appl. #PL2020-069 - Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) Amendment - Changes to Article 6 - Use Standards, to amend the distance separation requirements from a bar/tavern and restaurant, general to a residential use and residential district; Jeremy Kneeland, applicant
Sponsors: Development Services
Attachments: 1. Staff Memo, 2. Staff Report, 3. UDO Amendment - original Staff version, 4. UDO Amendment - original clean version, 5. UDO Amendment - revised Planning Commission version
Related files: BILL NO. 20-102

Title

Public Hearing: Appl. #PL2020-069 - Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) Amendment - Changes to Article 6 - Use Standards, to amend the distance separation requirements from a bar/tavern and restaurant, general to a residential use and residential district; Jeremy Kneeland, applicant

 

Body

Issue/Request:

The proposed amendment addresses separation requirements between bar/taverns and residential uses and districts, as well as between restaurants that serve alcohol and residential uses and districts.  The amendment reduces the minimum separation between a bar/tavern and residential uses and districts from 300 feet to 100 feet, and prescribes the method of measurement for said separation.  The proposed amendment also reduces the minimum separation between a stand-alone restaurant that sells alcohol and residential uses and districts from 100 feet to 50 feet.  The amendment further prescribes the method of measurement to determine separation of a restaurant that sells alcohol to residential uses and districts.

 

Presenter

Jeremy Kneeland, Applicant

Hector Soto, Jr., Planning Manager

 

Recommendation

Staff recommends approval of the UDO amendment to Article 6 as presented.

 

Committee Recommendation

Planning Commission Recommendation:  A motion was made by Vice Chair Funk, seconded by Board Member Loveless, that this application be recommended for approval as amended to the City Council. The motion carried by a unanimous 7-0 vote (Commissioners Kitchens and Lovell "Absent").