File #: 2018-2307    Name:
Type: Presentation Status: Passed
File created: 9/12/2018 In control: City Council - Regular Session
On agenda: 9/20/2018 Final action: 9/20/2018
Title: Request for Extension of Preliminary Development Plan application #PL2016-135 - Paragon Star.
Attachments: 1. Paragon Star 6 month Extension, 2. UDO Section 4.320
Related files: BILL NO. 16-211, 2016-0548
Title
Request for Extension of Preliminary Development Plan application #PL2016-135 - Paragon Star.

Body
Issue/Request:
Pursuant to Section 4.320.E of the Unified Development Ordinance, Paragon Star is requesting a 6 month extension of their currently approved Preliminary Development Plan (PDP).

Key Issues:
Per the UDO, a PDP is valid if a Final Development Plan (FDP) application is submitted within 24 months of the date of the original approval. If a FDP is not submitted within 24 months, the applicant can request approval from the Governing Body for one extension not to exceed 12 months.

The Preliminary Development Plan for Paragon Star was approved by City Council on October 6, 2016 as Ordinance No. 7987.

Written correspondence from the applicant requesting the extension is attached to this packet.

Provided below is a project status update provided to staff by the Developer:
The information below is being provided for informational purposes regarding the status of planning and engineering work completed, and work near completion, which contributes toward the Final Development Plan and clearing, grubbing and mass excavation of the Property.

The following underlying planning and engineering tasks have been completed and all are necessary assessments for the planning and infrastructure engineering required in the Final Development Plan application:
(1) Wetland Delineation and United States of America Corp of Engineers development permission,
(2) Waters of the US Section 404 Permit and mitigation credit agreement for wetland and stream credits,
(3) Federal Section 401 Water Quality Certification,
(4) Concurrence from the governmental agencies of no issues of Threatened and Endangered Species,
(5) Concurrence that there are no Bat Habitat issues, and
(6) Completion of a Cultural Resource Survey - Finding from State Historic Preservation office (SPO) of No Historic Properties Affected (Section 106 of National Historic Preservation Act).
(7) As re...

Click here for full text