File #: TMP-0018    Name:
Type: Ordinance Status: Reported to Council
File created: 4/8/2016 In control: Public Works Committee
On agenda: 4/19/2016 Final action:
Title: AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE AWARD OF BID NO. 39032272 FOR THE ARTERIAL CURB REPLACEMENT TO FREEMEN CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION, L.L.C. AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT FOR THE SAME IN THE AMOUNT OF $3,314,995.00.
Sponsors: Public Works Admin & Engineering
Attachments: 1. 39032272 Arterial Curb Replacement Proposed Ordinance.dotx, 2. 39032272 Proposed Arterial Curb Replacement Agreement .pdf, 3. 39032272 Arterial Curb Replacement Unofficial Bid Opening Tab .pdf, 4. 39032272 Arterials Curb Replacement Est. Quantities.pdf, 5. 39032272 Arterial Curb Replacement Maps.pdf
Related files: BILL NO. 16-90
Title
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE AWARD OF BID NO. 39032272 FOR THE ARTERIAL CURB REPLACEMENT TO FREEMEN CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION, L.L.C. AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT FOR THE SAME IN THE AMOUNT OF $3,314,995.00.

Body
Key Issues:
·The Arterial Curb Replacement arose from direction by the City Council to Public Works staff to use funds remaining from the 10 year road plan to replace curb and gutter on arterial streets that have deteriorated

·The Arterial Curb Replacement will also update sidewalk approaches to current specifications as required by the Federal Americans with Disabilities Act


Proposed City Council Motion:
I move for a second reading of AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE AWARD OF BID NO. 39032272 FOR THE ARTERIAL CURB REPLACEMENT TO FREEMEN CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION, L.L.C. AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT FOR THE SAME IN THE AMOUNT OF $3,314,995.00.
I move for adoption of AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE AWARD OF BID NO. 39032272 FOR THE ARTERIAL CURB REPLACEMENT TO FREEMEN CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION, L.L.C. AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT FOR THE SAME IN THE AMOUNT OF $3,314,995.00.

Background:
Much of the curb place in the KC Metro Area between 1985 and 2005 was installed using local limestone aggregate that was of poor quality because it was relatively soft compared to previous sources of rock. The aggregate still met local specifications, and worked well for buildings, foundations, and most structures. However, when used for paving, curb, or sidewalks, the aggregate was prone to fail within in 10 years due to the harsh freeze-thaw cycling combined with wet conditions. This process, call “...

Click here for full text